https://www.iisc.ac.in/
Insights into riverscape dynamics with the hydrological, ecological and social dimensions for water sustenance
T.V. Ramachandra1,2,3,*, S. Vinay1,4, S.Bharath1, M.D. Subhash Chandran1 and Bharath H.Aithal1,4
http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy/
1Energy and Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences [CES],
3Centre for infrastructure, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning [CiSTUP], Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560012, India.
*Corresponding author:
tvr@iisc.ac.in, emram.ces@courses.iisc.ac.in

References

1. Bruijnzeel, L. A., Hydrological functions of tropical forests: not seeing the soil for the trees? Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 2004, 104, 185–228.

2. Lana-Renault, N., Latron, J., Karssenberg, D., Serrano-Muela, P., Regüés, D., and Bierkens, M. F. P., Differences in stream flow in relation to changes in land cover: A comparative study in two sub-Mediterranean mountain catchments. J. Hydrol., 2011, 411, 366–378.

3. Bargués Tobella, A., Reese, H., Almaw, A., et al., The effect of trees on preferential flow and soil infiltrability in an agroforestry parkland in semiarid Burkina Faso. Water Resour. Res., 2014, 50, 3342–3354.

4. Mackey, B., Watson, J., and Worboys, G. L. G. ., Connectivity conservation and the Great Eastern Ranges corridor Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW, Sydney, Australia, 2010.

5. Vertessy, R. A., Watson, F. G. R., and O′Sullivan, S. K., Factors determining relations between stand age and catchment water balance in mountain ash forests. For. Ecol. Manage., 2001, 143, 13–26.

6. Pugh, D., How Forests Regulate Streamflows. 2014, pp. 1–8.

7. Kuczera, G., Prediction of water yield reductions following a bushfire in ash-mixed species eucalypt forest. J. Hydrol., 1987, 94, 215–236.

8. Pearce, A. J., Rowe, L. K., and O’Loughlin, C. L., Hydrologic regime of undisturbed mixed evergreen forests, south Nelson, New Zealand. J. Hydrol. (New Zealand), 1982, 21, 98–116.

9. Mehta, R., Jain, S. K., Rathor, D. S., and Garvit, K., Hydrological Impacts of Dams: A Review. Int. J. Water Resour. Environ. Manag., 2012, 3, 75–97.

10. Tiemann, J. S., Gillette, D. P., Wildhaber, M. L., and Edds, D. R., Effects of Lowhead Dams on Riffle-Dwelling Fishes and Macroinvertebrates in a Midwestern River. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 2004, 133, 705–717.

11. Tiemann, J. S., Dodd, H. R., Owens, N., and Wahl, D. H., Effects of Lowhead Dams on Unionids in the Fox River, Illinois. Northeast. Nat., 2007, 14, 125–138.

12. Jansson, R., Nilsson, C., and Renöfält, B., Fragmentation of riparian floras in rivers with multiple dams. Ecology, 2000, 81, 899–903.

13. Nilsson, C. and Berggren, K., Alterations of Riparian Ecosystems Caused by River Regulation: Dam operations have caused global-scale ecological changes in riparian ecosystems. How to protect river environments and human needs of rivers remains one of the most important questions of ou. Bioscience, 2000, 50, 783–792.

14. Jain, S. K., Assessment of environmental flow requirements. Hydrol. Process., 2012, 26, 3472–3476.

15. Salik, K. M., Hashmi, M. Z.-R., Ishfaq, S., and Zahdi, W.-Z., Environmental flow requirements and impacts of climate change-induced river flow changes on ecology of the Indus Delta, Pakistan. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci., 2016, 7, 185–195.

16. Bunn, S. E. and Arthington, A. H., Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity. Environ. Manage., 2002, 30, 492–507.

17. Poff, N. L., Allan, J. D., Bain, M. B., et al., The Natural Flow Regime: A paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience, 1997, 47, 769–784.

18. Peñas, F. J., Juanes, J. A., Galván, C., et al., Estimating minimum environmental flow requirements for well-mixed estuaries in Spain. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 2013, 134, 138–149.

19. Kimmerer, W. J., Physical, biological, and management responses to variable freshwater flow into the San Francisco Estuary. Estuaries, 2002, 25, 1275–1290.

20. Brown, C. and King, J., Environmental Flows: Concepts and Methods Water Resour. Environ. Tech. note C.1., 1st ed. The World Bank, 2003.

21. Hughes, D. A., Providing hydrological information and data analysis tools for the determination of ecological instream flow requirements for South African rivers. J. Hydrol., 2001, 241, 140–151.

22. Yang, F., Xia, Z., Yu, L., and Guo, L., Calculation and Analysis of the Instream Ecological Flow for the Irtysh River. Procedia Eng., 2012, 28, 438–441.

23. Chen, H. and Zhao, Y. W., Evaluating the environmental flows of China’s Wolonghu wetland and land use changes using a hydrological model, a water balance model, and remote sensing. Ecol. Modell., 2011, 222, 253–260.

24. Sims, N. C. and Colloff, M. J., Remote sensing of vegetation responses to flooding of a semi-arid floodplain: Implications for monitoring ecological effects of environmental flows. Ecol. Indic., 2012, 18, 387–391.

25. Dyson, M., Bergkamp, G., and Scanlon, J. (eds.), Flow – The essentials of environmental flows Gland Switz. IUCN, 2nd ed. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Switzerland, 2013.

26. Ramachandra, T. V and Bharath, S., Geoinformatics based Valuation of Forest Landscape Dynamics in Central Western Ghats, India. J. Remote Sens. GIS, 2018, 07.

27. Ramachandra, T. V., Vinay, S., and Subash Chandran, M. D., Quantification of annual sediment deposits for sustainable sand management in Aghanashini river estuary. J. Environ. Manage., 2018, 206, 1263–1273.

28. Gunnel, Y. and Radhakrishna, B. P. (eds.), Sahyadri : the great escarpment of the Indian subcontinent Geological Society of India, Bangalore, 2001.

29. International Union for Concervation of Nature. 2019.

30. Conservation International, Hotspots. 2002.

31. Ramachandra, T. V, Soman, D., Naik, A. D., and Subash Chandran, M. D., Appraisal of Forest Ecosystems Goods and Services: Challenges and Opportunities for Conservation. J. Biodivers., 2017, 8, 12–33.

32. Daniels, R. R. J. and Venkatesan, J., Western Ghats-Biodiversity, People, Conservation Rupa & Company, 2008.

33. Suryanath, U. K. (ed.), Uttara Kannada District Gazetteer Government of Karnataka, 1985.

34. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, Census of India. Minist. Home Aff. Gov. India, 2011.

35. Jarvis, A., Reuter, H. I., Nelson, A., and Guevara, E., SRTM 90m Digital Elevation Database v4.1. Cgiar-Csi, 2008.

36. Survey of India, Topographic Maps. Dep. Sci. Technol., 2018.

37. United States Geological Survey., Earthexplorer. United States Geol. Surv., 2000.

38. Survey of India, Nakshe. Dep. Sci. Technol., 2018.

39. Pascal, J. P., Explanatory Booklet on the Forest Map of South India French Institute of Pondicherry, 1986.

40. Google, Google Earth. 2018.

41. National Remote Sensing Centre, Bhuvan. Indian Sp. Res. Organ. Gov. India, 2016.

42. Department of Science and Technology, Karnataka State Natural Disater Monitoring Centre. Gov. Karnataka, 2007.

43. Directorate of Economics and Statistics. Gov. Karnataka, 2017.

44. Indian Meterological Department, Hydrometerological Services. Minist. Earth Sci. Gov. India, 2018.

45. Food and Agriculture Organisation, Meteorological data. Food Agric. Organ., 2017.

46. District Statistical Office, District Statistics at a Glance Bengaluru, 2016.

47. Karnataka State Department of Agriculture, Raitamitra. 2017.

48. Department of Economics and Statistics, Season and Crop Report Tamil Nadu 2009 - 2010 Chennai (India), 2011.

49. Nagarjuna Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd, Ikisan Agri-Informatics and Services Division. Nagarjuna Fertil. Chem. Ltd, 2017.

50. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, TNAU Agritech Portal. Tamil Nadu Agric. Univ.,.

51. Ramachandra, T., Vinay, S., and Bharath, H. A., Environmental Flow Assessment in a Lotic Ecosystem of Central Western Ghats, India. Hydrol. Curr. Res., 2016, 7, 1–14.

52. Ramachandra, T. V, Vinay, S., Bharath, S., and Shashishankar, A., Eco-Hydrological Footprint of a River Basin in Western Ghats. Yale J. Biol. Med., 2018, 91, 431–444.

53. Putty, M. R. Y. and Prasad, R., Understanding runoff processes using a watershed model—a case study in the Western Ghats in South India. J. Hydrol., 2000, 228, 215–227.

54. Ramachandra, T. V, Hydrological Responses at Regional Scale to Landscape Dynamics. J. Biodivers., 2014, 5, 11–32.

55. Vinay, S., Vishnu, D. M., Srikanth, N., et al., Hydrological regime in Sacred Groves and NonSacred Groves of Central Western Ghats. In Lake 2016 : Conference on Conservation and Sustainable Management of Ecologically Sensitive Regions in Western Ghats Moodbidri, Dakshina Kannada, Karnataka, 2016.

56. India Biodiversity Portal, The Western Ghats. India bidivesrity portal,.

57. Avibase - the world bird database. 2003.

58. ENVIS, CES, Iis., Sahyadri: Western Ghats Biodiversity Information System. 1995.

59. Karnataka Forest Department. Gov. Karnataka, 2018.

60. Mahima, B., Nayak, V. N., Subash Chandran, M. D., and Ramachandra, T. V, Fish distribution dynamics in the Aghanashini estuary of Uttara Kannada, west coast of India. Curr. Sci., 2014, 106, 1739–1744.

61. Mahima, B., Nayak, V. N., Subash Chandran, M. D., and Ramachandra, T. V, Impact of Hydroelectric Dams on Fisheries in the Sharavathi Estuary of Uttara Kannada District. In Lake 2012: Conference on Conservation and Management of Wetland Ecosystems Kottayam, Kerala, 2012.

62. Mahima, B., Nayak, V. N., Subash Chandran, M. D., and Ramachandra, T. V, Inventory of fishes of Gangavali estuary in Uttara Kannada, Karnataka state. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. India, 2016, 58, 69–74.

63. Ramachandra, T. V, Subash Chandran, M. D., Joshi, N. V, et al., Integrated Ecological Carrying Capacity of Uttara Kannada District, Karnataka Sahyadri Concervation Series 47, ENVIS Technical Report 87, 2014.

64. Balachandran, C., Dinakaran, S., Subash Chandran, M. D., and Ramachandra, T. V, Diversity and Distribution of Aquatic Insects in Aghanashini River of Central Western Ghats, India. In Lake 2012: Conference on Conservation and Management of Wetland Ecosystems Kottayam, Kerala, 2012.

65. Ramachandra, T. V, Subash Chandran, M. D., Joshi, N. V, and Bhoominathan, M., Edible Bivalves of Central West Coast, Uttara Kannada District, Karnataka, India Sahyadri Concervation Series 17, ENVIS Technical Report 48, Bangalore, 2012.

66. Boominathan, M., Subash Chandran, M. D., and Ramachandra, T. V, Economic Valuation of Bivalves in the Aghanashini Estuary, West Coast, Karnataka Sahyadri Conservation Series 9, ENVIS Technical Report: 301, Bangalore, 2008.

67. Ramachandra, T. V, Rao, G. R., Vishnu, D. M., and Subash Chandran, M. D., Forest trees of Central Western Ghats ENVIS Technical Report 121, Bangalore 560 012, 2017.

68. Ramachandra, T. V, Subash Chandran, M. D., Joshi, N. V, Karthik, B., Sameer, A., and Vishnu, D. M., Ecohydrology of Lotic Ecosystems of Uttara Kannada, Central Western Ghats Sahyadri Concervation Series 14, ENVIS Technical Report 40, Bangalore 560 012, 2012.

69. Karthik, B. and Ramachandra, T. V, Water Quality Status of Sharavathi River Basin, Western Ghats Sahyadri Conservation Series 6, ENVIS Technical Report 23, Bangalore, 2006.

70. Amit, S. Y., Gururaja, K. V, Karthik, B., et al., Ecological Status of Kali River Flood Plain ENVIS Technical Report 29, Bangalore, 2008.

71. Ramachandra, T. V, Vinay, S., Bharath, S., and Bharath, H. A., Profile of rivers in Karnataka Sahyadri Concervation Series 71, ENVIS Technical Report 129, Bangalore, 2017.

72. Kumar, U., Chiranjit, M., and Ramachandra, T. V, Multi resolution spatial data mining for assessing land use patterns. In Data mining and warehousing Sudeep Ela. CENGAGE Learning, Delhi, 2015, pp. 97–138.

73. Lillesand, T. M., Kiefer, R. W., and Chipman, J. W., Remote sensing and image interpretation Lloydia Cincinnati, 7th ed. Wiley, New York, 2004.

74. Bharath, H. A., Vinay, S., Chandan, M. C., Gouri, B. A., and Ramachandra, T. V., Green to gray: Silicon Valley of India. J. Environ. Manage., 2018, 206, 1287–1295.

75. Ramachandra, T. V, Bharath, S., Rajan, K. S., and Subash Chandran, M. D., Stimulus of developmental projects to landscape dynamics in Uttara Kannada, Central Western Ghats. Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Sp. Sci., 2016, 19, 175–193.

76. Haddad, N. M., Brudvig, L. A., Clobert, J., et al., Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci. Adv., 2015, 1.

77. Jha, C. S., Goparaju, L., Tripathi, A., Gharai, B., Raghubanshi, A. S., and Singh, J. S., Forest fragmentation and its impact on species diversity: An analysis using remote sensing and GIS. Biodivers. Conserv., 2005, 14, 1681–1698.

78. Laurance, W. F., Laurance, S. G., and Delamonica, P., Tropical forest fragmentation and greenhouse gas emissions. For. Ecol. Manage., 1998, 110, 173–180.

79. Ramachandra, T. V, Bharath, S., and Subash Chandran, M. D., Geospatial analysis of forest fragmentation in Uttara Kannada District, India. For. Ecosyst., 2016, 3, 15.

80. Sreekantha, Gururaja, K. V, and Ramachandra, T. V, Nestedness pattern in freshwater fishes of the Western Ghats: an indication of stream islands along riverscapes. Curr. Sci., 2008, 95, 1707–1714.

81. Ramachandra, T. V, Vinay, S., and Aithal, B. H., Environmental flow assessment in a lotic ecosystem of Central Western Ghats, India. Hydrol. Curr. Res., 2016.

82. Ramachandra, T. V, Subash Chandran, M. D., Vinay, S., et al., Sacred Groves (Kan forests) of Sagara taluk, Shimoga district Sahyadri Conservation Series: 54, ENVIS Technical Report 102, Bangalore, 2016.

83. KBB, Karnataka Biodiversity Board. Gov. Karnataka, 2018.

84. Ramachandra, T. V, Subash Chandran, M. D., Joshi, N. V, Mahima, B., Prakash, N. M., and Srikanth, N., Estuarine fish diversity and livelihood in Uttara Kannada district, Karnataka state Sahyadri Conservation Series 34, ENVIS Technical Report 64, Bangalore, 2013.

85. IUCN, The IUCN red list of threatened species. 2019.

86. Wang, F., Qin, Z., Song, C., Tu, L., Karnieli, A., and Zhao, S., An Improved Mono-Window Algorithm for Land Surface Temperature Retrieval from Landsat 8 Thermal Infrared Sensor Data. Remote Sens., 2015, 7, 4268–4289.

87. Ramachandra, T. V, Bharath, S., and Nimish, G., Modelling landscape dynamics with LST in protected areas of Western Ghats, Karnataka. J. Environ. Manage., 2018, 206, 1253–1262.

88. Ramachandra, T. V, Subash Chandran, M. D., Joshi, N. V, et al., Water Bodies of Uttara Kannada Sahyadri Concervation Serives 44, ENVIS Technical Report 81, Bengaluru560012, 2014.

89. Vinay, S., Bharath, S., Bharath, H. A., and Ramachandra, T. V., Hydrologic model with landscape dynamics for drought monitoring. In Joint International Workshop of ISPRS VIII/1 and WG IV/4 on Geospatial Data for Disaster and Risk Reduction Hyderabad, 2013.

90. Ramachandra, T. V, Nagar, N., Vinay, S., and Bharath, H. A., Modelling hydrologic regime of Lakshmanatirtha watershed, Cauvery river. In 2014 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference - South Asia Satellite, GHTC-SAS 2014 2014, pp. 64–71.

91. Vinay, S., Vishnu, D. M., Srikanth, N., et al., Landscapes and Hydrological Regime Linkages: Case study of Chandiholé, Aghanashini,. In National Seminar for Research Scholars 2017 Bangalore, India, 2017.

92. Johansson, E. L., Fader, M., Seaquist, J. W., and Nicholas, K. A., Green and blue water demand from large-scale land acquisitions in Africa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2016, 113, 11471–11476.

93. Mutreja, K. N., Applied Hydrology 4th ed. Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, 1995.

94. Ramachandra, T. V, Setturu, B., Rajan, K. S., and Subash Chandran, M. D., Modelling the forest transition in Central Western Ghats, India. Spat. Inf. Res., 2017, 25, 117–130.

95. Ramachandra, T. V, Subash Chandran, M. D., Joshi, N. V, and Bharath, S., Fragmentation of Uttara Kannada forests Sahyadri Conservation Series 29, ENVIS Technical Report 57, Bangalore, 2013.

96. Ramachnadra, T. V., Subash Chandran, M. D., Rao, G. R., Vishnu, D. M., and Joshi, N. V., Floristic Diversity in Uttara Kannada District, Karnataka. In Biodiversity in India (eds. Pullaiah, T., and Sandhya Rani, S.), 1st ed. Regency Publications, New Delhi, 2015, pp. 1–87.

97. Rao, G. R., Krishnakumar, G., Dudani, S. N., Chandran, M. D. S., and Ramachandra, T. V., Vegetation Changes along Altitudinal Gradients in Human Disturbed Forests of Uttara Kannada, Central Western Ghats. J. Biodivers., 2017.

98. Ramachandra, T. V, Bharath, S., Subash Chandran, M. D., and Joshi, N. V, Salient Ecological Sensitive Regions of Central Western Ghats, India. Earth Syst. Environ., 2018, 2, 15–34.

99. Mahima, B., Nayak, V. N., Subash Chandran, M. D., and Ramachandra, T. V, Impact of hydroelectric projects on finfish diversity in the Sharavathi River estuary of Uttara Kannada District, central west coast of India. Int. J. Environ. Sci., 2014, 5.

100. Ramachandra, T. V, Subash Chandran, M. D., Joshi, N. V, Rakhi, R. K., Prakash, N. M., and Sumesh, N. D., Valuation of Estuarine Ecosystem, Uttara Kannada District, Karnataka Sahyadri Conservation Series 27, ENVIS Technical Report 45, Bangalore, 2013.

Citation :Ramachandra T. V., Vinay S., Bharath S., Subash Chandran M. D. and Bharath H. Aithal, 2020. Insights into riverscape dynamics with the hydrological, ecological and social dimensions for water sustenance, Current Science, Vol. 118(9): 1379-1393
* Corresponding Author :
Dr. T.V. Ramachandra
Energy & Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore – 560 012, India.
Tel : +91-80-2293 3099/2293 3503-extn 107,      Fax : 91-80-23601428 / 23600085 / 23600683 [CES-TVR]
E-mail :tvr@iisc.ac.in emram.ces@courses.iisc.ac.in,     Web : http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy, http://ces.iisc.ernet.in/grass
E-mail   |    Sahyadri    |    ENVIS    |    GRASS    |    Energy    |      CES      |      CST      |    CiSTUP    |      IISc      |    E-mail